The
County has submitted the attached
as the final design alternative
for the Craigie Clair Bridge.After
talking to Eric Hamerstrom (Bridge
Chair), we emailed the County
re: two points:
1-No
mention was made of the
finished surface - our
consensus was that painting
it green would be historically
accurate as well as helping
to mask the increased
dimensions of the structure
by better blending with
background foliage.
2-The
look of the replicated "dry
laid-up stone" abutments
- we asked if a design
most closely resembling
stone found elsewhere
on the Beaverkill would
be possible. |
The
picture above was taken in the
summer of 2002 looking downstream.
Bridge
Replacement
Craigie
Clair Road ( Town Highway
No. 30)
Over
the Beaverkill
Town
of Rockland ,
Sullivan
County
Purpose
The
purpose of this Newsletter is
to provide the general public
with an update to the comments
received from the June 12, 2004
Public Information Meeting and
to update the public on the
continued design of the new
bridge.
Project
Objective
- Provide
a bridge that is environmentally
sound, similar to the existing,
and will accommodate emergency,
commercial, and recreational
vehicles.
- Remove
structural deficiencies, correct
functional obsolescence, and
increased load capacity (HS-25).
- Continue
to provide a single-lane bridge.
- Eliminate
horizontal and vertical clearance
restrictions.
What's
next?
- The
Final Draft Design Report
was sent to Sullivan County
and NYSDOT on September 22,
2004 for their review and
comments.
- Detailed
Design plans of the new bridge
will be submitted to New York
State Office of Parks, Recreation
and Historic Preservation
(SHPO) for their review. SHPO
will then prepare a Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA) to address
the “Adverse Effects” that
is associated with the demolition/removal
of a National Register eligible
resource.
- The
existing bridge will be advertised
in an attempt to donate the
bridge to an agency, organization,
group or individual that is
interested in preserving and
using the bridge.
Summary
from the June 12, 2004 Public
Information Meeting
The
purpose of the June 12, 2004
Public Information Meeting was
to provide the general public
with an opportunity to review
the alternatives being considered
and provide Sullivan County
and NYSDOT with comments regarding
these alternatives. The following
summarizes the comments received
from the Public Information
Meeting along with a response:
- C –
The public would like the
design of the new bridge be
similar to the existing bridge.
The overwhelming choice by
the public was Alternative
2: Replacement on Existing
Alignment – Through Truss.
- R –
The Through Truss is the preferred
alternative being progressed
in final design. The new Through
Truss will have a similar
appearance as the existing
bridge. Member sizes will
need to be larger to accommodate
the required loading.
- C –
The public would like to see
the ornamental steel work
that is on the existing bridge
placed on the new bridge.
- R –
The new bridge will be designed
with ornamental lattice details
similar to the details found
on the existing bridge at
both the portal ends and on
the interior vertical members.
- C –
The public would like to see
the new abutment have a dry
laid-up stone face similar
to the original bridge abutments.
- R –
Form liners will be used on
the faces of the new abutments
to give the appearance of
dry laid-up stone to match
the original existing bridge.
- C –
The public would like the
new bridge to handle larger
vehicles and greater loads.
- R
– The
new bridge will be designed
to provide a load capacity
to eliminate all load restrictions
on the bridge. Sullivan
County wanted the design
of the new bridge to handle
their largest dump truck
with a snowplow. The lane
width (curb-to-curb) of
the bridge will also increase
from 3.9 m (12.75 ft.) to
4.9 m (16.0 ft.). The vertical
clearance will be increased
from 3.4 m (11.2 ft.) to
4.9 m (16.0 ft), which is
the same clearance used
on highways with an overhead
bridge. Also, the new bridge
will be designed to allow
a 12.0 m (39.4 ft.) bus
or recreational vehicle
or a single axle truck with
a 9.1 m (30.0 ft.) trailer
to make the approach and
exit turns to the bridge
from both ends.
New
York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Preservation
(SHPO) Involvement
Due
to the historic qualities of
the bridge and the adjacent
Dundas Castle property, the
New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Preservation
(SHPO) has been involved with
this project since the early
planning stages. The following
is a summary of SHPO's involvement/activities.
Planning/Scoping
Phases:
- Based
on their review of all of
the alternatives considered
for the project (i.e. bridge
rehabilitation, bridge at
a new location, and bridge
replacement at the existing
location) SHPO concluded that
the bridge rehabilitation
was not a reasonable alternative.
(June 2002)
- SHPO
could most readily support
the bridge replacement on
the existing alignment with
a Through Truss similar to
the existing bridge. (June
2002).
Preliminary
Design Phases:
- Based
on SHPO's review of the feasible
alternatives, the Pony Truss
and the Through Truss on existing
alignment, presented in the
Draft Design Report, they
supported the Through Truss.
(June 2004)
- SHPO
agreed with the Phase I Archaeology
Survey Prepared by the consultant
that the project would have
no adverse effect on the archaeological
resources. (June 2004)
- SHPO
required the following mitigation
efforts for replacing the
bridge. (June 2004)
- Preparation
of a Level 2 HABS recordation,
which provides a permanent
documentation of the existing
bridge.
- Effort
on the part of Sullivan County
to donate the existing bridge
to any municipality, group,
agency or individual that
would be interested in the
taking the bridge.
Description
of
the
Preferred
Alternative
–Through
Truss
Above
is a computer generated picture
of the bridge to be, looking upstream.
Detours
during Construction
During
the construction period pedestrian,
bicycle and vehicle traffic
will be detoured around the
project site. There will be
two different detours. Since
the existing bridge is currently
posted for a 4.5 metric tons
(5 tons) weight limit, vehicles
weighing more than the posted
limit are already detouring
around the site, using Detour
A, which is 11.2 miles. Local
vehicles weighting less than
2.7 metric tons (3 tons) will
make use of Detour B, which
will be 6.4 miles long.
Further
comments regarding the project
are welcome. These comments
can be made in any of the
following ways:
- Mail
enclosed comment form to
Sullivan County .
- E-mail
comment to Sullivan County
.
- Call
Sullivan County .
- County
contact person, address, e-mail
address and phone number are
noted on lower left of the
first page of this newsletter.
home | calendar | headlines & happenings | milestones | church
about us | maps | photos| stories | archives
©
Friends
of
Beaverkill
Community
1998-2012. All
rights
reserved. |